There's been something very clean for me to speak about how things are in Haiti or Palestine. In this place, things are this way. There, things are like this or that. In Haiti, children eat dirt cookies.
In Palestine children have no plumbing.
In Bangladesh, it is bamboo being labored over and hauled around - - not sugar cane. In Bangladesh, children are not running from bulldozers, rather, they suffer a no-win battle with the rainy season.
In Bangladesh I now know that poverty is not specified and particular. Extreme poverty looks almost the same everywhere. And it is heartbreaking. That sweet smell of pollution and human waste crosses political boundaries.
The rickshaw, however, is special. Today, while traveling two hours away to interview micro-loan borrowers in villages, I watched hundreds of them on the streets. I likened them to sacred canopies, life-giving and vibrant with color, perhaps serving as shields.
Kate Burke, Divinity School
As an American, it is so easy to take so much for granted. It is easy to underestimate how much of our daily lives and quality of life is dependent on government and legal structure. Being in Bangladesh has brought that to my attention. Several specific areas that I have seen are:
· Trash - There is so much trash in the streets and on the ground
· Streets – The quality of the streets are very poor. Holes and crumbling pavement are the norm, especially as you move out of Dhaka into the country. This (as well as the narrowness of the roads) makes transportation slow and seemingly inefficient. I can see how this impacts the ability of companies to move into the area as it makes it time consuming to transport goods.
· Law – We had the circumstance where our van was hit by a bus (we were not in it). The van hit a rickshaw and we were told that the rickshaw driver had been sent to the hospital and had possibly died. When I asked about what would happen to the bus driver, I was told that he would pay a fine and if he could not afford the fine, he would go to prison. The consequences seem light for those who can afford to buy their way out.
Prior to coming to Bangladesh I thought that the majority of company responsibility when operating in a community was to provide safe and clean work environments and livable wages for its employees. I now think it is about much more. We need to think about employees holistically and make sure that they have access to quality healthcare, education for their children, and food on the table. A company’s commitment to these things has the ability to ensure quality workforce for themselves and the ability to transform communities from poverty.
Margaret Foster, Owen Graduate School of Management
Grameen and BRAC have very different micro-credit models. They both lend to the “poorest of the poor”, but approach it in different ways. Grameen is strictly a bank, no additional training or guidance involved for the borrower or the community. BRAC takes a more holistic view by providing education for children and legal education for women. Which approach is better is a matter of opinion. The one trait they both have in common is the repeat borrowing. Many borrowers continue request and receive money from both organizations, increasing the amounts each time. This may show the availability of credit for the poor, but it calls into question the use of the loans and the community affect of these programs.
A business that has to continually borrow each year to continue to operate is not a sustainable enterprise. For example, many of the borrowers invested in livestock and borrowed money to pay for the care and food for the animals. If the loan money is needed to feed the livestock, then the revenue generated from the business is not enough. The other issue that arises is if you are not borrowing from these organizations within the village, you are not a part of the community. Your neighbors and friends belong to the organization and attend the meetings are involved in various classes or groups. A person could feel pressured to borrow more money just to be included in the community. As a result the borrower could become overextended financially, which is extremely dangerous for someone living at the poverty level.
Both organizations have done a tremendous amount of good, and have allowed many people to access credit who would otherwise not have it available to them. However, the subtle pressure that is placed on the borrower and the progressive borrowing is disconcerting.
LaDonna Thornton, Owen Graduate School of Management
Seeing the injustices of life in Bangladesh make me all the more aware of human interconnectivity. The way we live affects the way our human brothers and sisters live in Bangladesh. One can easily forget the way in which our Western extravagances—hoarding the world’s resources, for example—take a toll on our fellow human beings until we come face to face and nose to nose with it. I witnessed an excellent example of this profound interrelatedness on our return trip as I waited in the Houston airport, suddenly surrounded by white people. All I could think was, “We are all so big!” Our Bangladeshi translators told us about how thin, short, and small they are compared to their ancestors. Americans, on the other hand, face a national obesity crisis.
I firmly believe that we should avoid trying to compartmentalize or explain away the poverty that we saw in Bangladesh. As Vanderbilt students, we have been given a rare opportunity to witness the way in which most of the world lives. As such, we should meditate with repentance and sorrow as to our own participation in the systems that perpetuate extreme poverty in nations like Bangladesh.
Emily Sullivan, Divinity School